October 29, 2001
For Immediate Release
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
tel: (202) 775-1918

ANCA WORKING TO REVERSE SENATE ACTION WEAKENING SECTION 907

Senate Amendment Lacks Effective "Sunset" Clause Senate Amendment Includes no Prohibition on Azerbaijan's use of U.S. Arms against Karabagh

WASHINGTON, DC – The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) continues to educate legislators about the dangers to Nagorno Karabagh and Armenia, and the damage to U.S. regional interests that would occur if an anti-Section 907 amendment recently adopted in the U.S. Senate survives the conference committee process and is enacted into law.

On October 24th, the Senate, under extraordinary pressure from the State Department, adopted a broadly worded waiver of Section 907 that would effectively provide the President with nearly unrestricted authority to provide military aid to Azerbaijan, despite that nation’s recent threats of renewed aggression towards Nagorno Karabagh and its long-standing refusal to comply with the terms of this law. The Senate action took the form of an amendment to the fiscal year 2002 foreign aid bill. Since it was first adopted into law in 1992, Section 907 has restricted certain types of direct U.S. aid to the government of Azerbaijan due to its blockades against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh.

The ANCA is currently educating members of Congress on this issue through its office in Washington, DC, regional offices in Boston and Los Angeles, more than 45 local chapters, and activists in all 50 states. Specifically, they are explaining that the enactment into law of the Senate amendment would:

* Effectively amount to the repeal of Section 907.

* Open the door to U.S. military aid to an
Azerbaijani government that has harbored
terrorists tied to Osama bin Laden and,
very recently, threatened to launch a renewed
war on Nagorno Karabagh;

* Set back the cause of lifting Azerbaijan’s
dual blockades of Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh;

* Send the dangerous signal to Azerbaijan that the
U.S. and the international community will stand
on the sidelines if the Azerbaijani military
attacks what it is now terming the “terrorists”
of Nagorno Karabagh.

* Destablize a strategically important region and
significantly complicate the U.S.-led war on
terrorism.

The next step in the legislative process will be for a conference committee of Senators and Representatives to reconcile the Senate’s version of the foreign aid bill with the House version, which does not include any language weakening Section 907. The key players in the conference committee are already meeting on this subject and are scheduled to finalize their deliberations in a meeting as early as Wednesday, October 31st or Thursday, November 1st.


President Kocharian Wrote to President Bush Outlining the Dangers of Weakening Section 907:


In an October 9th letter to President Bush, Armenian President Robert Kocharian outlined the negative impact that weakening Section 907 would have on the OSCE Minsk Group mediated Nagorno Karabagh peace process. In this letter, he explained that Section 907 and the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades of Armenia have been interlinked through the life of this conflict, and are part of the overall package of issues that require resolution. He noted that removing one element independently would irreparably damage the peace process.

Following the Senate vote, Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian expressed his hope that “additional precautions will be built in” during the conference committee process.

According to today’s Radio Free Europe’s Caucasus Report, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Vilayat Guliev has described the Senate’s decision as a major foreign policy success. The Baku daily Zerkalo, in its October 26th edition, quoted an unnamed official from the Azerbaijani Embassy in Washington as saying that Azerbaijan can now get “unlimited assistance in any sphere.”


Major Armenian American Organizations Wrote to President Bush in Defense of Section 907:

On October 23, the seventeen leading Armenian American political, religious, and humanitarian institutions, representing essentially the entire organized Armenian American community wrote a letter to President Bush voiced their “unambiguous support for Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act as a vital element of U.S. policy toward the Caucasus and a key instrument of stability in a region of great strategic significance to our nation during this time of crisis.” They noted in their collective letter that, “retreating from the principles of Section 907 will, in our view, lead to a destabilization of the regional balance of power, to the detriment of the peoples of the region and the international community.” The co-signers of the letter were:

Apostolic Exarchate for Armenian Catholics
Armenian Evangelical Union of North America
Armenian Missionary Association of America
Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church – Eastern Region
Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church – Western Region
Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church – Eastern Region
Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church – Western Region
Armenian American Democratic Leadership Council
Armenian Bar Association
Armenian General Benevolent Union
Armenian National Committee of America
Armenian Relief Society
Armenian Youth Federation of America
Hamazkayn Armenian Cultural and Educational Association
Homenetmen Armenian General Athletic Union
Knights of Vartan
National Organization of Republican Armenians


Nationwide Grassroots Activism:

In recent weeks, tens of thousands of Armenian Americans, from all reaches of the community, have communicated their commitment to maintaining Section 907 to their legislators through Congressional WebFaxes, letters, phone calls, visits, and petitions. Among the concerns raised by defenders of Section 907 were the dangers posed by the Senate amendment, specifically:

1) The lack of a meaningful “sunset” provision places no limits on the term of the waiver and represents an effective repeal of Section 907. This provision, as it now stands, would prevent Congress from exercising its oversight responsibility and undermine its legislative prerogatives.

2) The amendment does not state that the President must certify that Azerbaijan will not use U.S. assistance for offensive uses against Nagorno Karabagh.

The amendment does requires that the President certify that Azerbaijan will not use U.S. assistance against Armenia, but, very significantly, does NOT include Nagorno Karabagh. Both the State Department and Sen. Brownback insisted upon the exclusion of Nagorno Karabagh from this provision of the Senate amendment.

This wording sends the dangerous signal to the Azerbaijani government that the United States, while still seeking to deter Azerbaijani aggression against Armenia, will not oppose renewed Azerbaijani aggression against Nagorno Karabagh. The implication of this language is that Azerbaijan’s actions against Nagorno Karabagh are an internal Azerbaijani matter and that, accordingly, the United States would remain on the sidelines in the event that Azerbaijan follows through on its recent threats to launch a new offensive against Nagorno Karabagh.

3) The absence of a specific requirement of incremental parity between assistance provided to Armenia and Azerbaijan threatens to contribute to the destabilization of the region.

3) The phrase regarding the provision of U.S. assistance to support the “operational readiness of U.S. Armed Forces or coalition partners” is so broadly worded that it would allow almost any form of U.S. military hardware or training, including official American material and technical support for the stationing of Turkish “coalition partners” on Azerbaijani soil, which is, increasingly, a distinct possibility.

4) The amendment does not specifically enumerate the types of assistance that can be provided to Azerbaijan under the general heading of “counter terrorism,” leaving the door open to Azerbaijan’s using this aid in what it has recently begun calling its “anti-terrorism” war against Nagorno Karabagh. Nor does it in any way limit the provision of such assistance to the U.S.-led effort to bring to justice the perpetrators of the September 11th attacks on the United States.

5) The reporting requirements are too limited and do not include specific demands for updates on 1) The use of aid provided under this waiver against Armenia or Nagorno Karabagh, and 2) The Administration’s efforts to encourage Azerbaijan to comply with the terms of Section 907 by lifting its blockades against Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh

To learn how to help save Section 907, visit: http://www.anca.org

#####